पृष्ठ:रस मीमांसा.pdf/४५३

विकिस्रोत से
यह पृष्ठ अभी शोधित नहीं है।
४४०
रस-मीमांसा

________________

रस-मीमांसा Remarks There should be no vagueness in the meaning of a. Properly speaking it should be confined to the "want of hrat" (want of rational or logical connection in the wording of the statement), but by the term is also understood inapplicability of th statement (though rationally sound) to the particular circumstance of the case, as is evident from the example आपने बड़ा उपकार किया etc. This has been called an example of arki लक्षणा. In my opinion वाक्यगत is no लक्षणा but व्यंजना. The example will be of लक्षणा if the sentence is precided by some such expression as आपने मेरा घर ले लिया etc, Rejection of the example of a given by काव्यप्रकाश। The example is a H. Mammat alludes to the derivative meaning (व्युत्पत्ति-निमित्त 22 ) of pro and takes it for you or i. But what is to be taken into account is the common acceptation of the term ( gft-Fi ). Otherwise one may see out in the use of the word oît also ( 11 = that which goes ). TEU of two kinds-BER ERU and USERUT.