________________
रस-मीमांसा be asked, "If he and arti may suffice what is the need of a third eft, UIT." अन्विताभिधानवादीs on the strength of their maxim : To: En assert that inte may be fully conveyed by T. They hold that every वाक्य, whether पौरुषेय 01 अपौरुषेय, refers to some action. The words of 154 also refer to action. The result of that action is supreme pleasure. Therefore, and of a poetic वाक्य is sup1:erme pleasure. The तात्पर्य of poetic are is nothing but its synthetic meaning. Hence, no need of a separate gfa, usal. Refutation-The significance of the word TFTC: is not clear. It may either mean any meaning proceeding from a ap or the area E. If it means the former, there is no dispute, for jm is also a meaning. If it means the latter, it may be asked whether it is the same as the तात्पर्यवृत्ति of the अभिहितान्वयवादी Mimansakas, signifying a ct, i.e. connected meaning. If it is the same, it is to be noted that arqamot stops after it has connected the meaning of different words into one synthetic whole. If it is any are other than 1594, then the fourth gratis admitted whatever you may choose to call it.
