पृष्ठ:परमार्थ-सोपान.pdf/५०२

विकिस्रोत से
यह पृष्ठ अभी शोधित नहीं है।

4 the case either of McDougall or Shand. Who ever has found specific terminologies for the two sets without their involving some overlapping? How overlapping is the correspondence between Instincts and Emotions in McDongall? The same applies to. Bhavas and Rasas among the ancient अलंकारिकs, Bhavas are superior to Rasas, because Bhavas are the bases of Rasas. Juaneshwar seems to have studied Alankara Shastra — cf. Thiagio giữời रसभावफुल फुलेल । नानार्थफळभारे फळा येईल. ब्रह्मास्वादसहोदरो रसः says Jagannath Pandit. This is in rhetoric. रसवर्ज सोऽप्यस्य परं दृष्ट्वा निवर्तते, says the Gita. This is Rasa in Psychology. : says the Upanishad. This is in Metaphysics or Mysticism. We may remark in passing that the aphorism ... has been wrongly quoted by Jagannath Pandit. He need not have quoted this Śruti in support of a mere poetical doctrine. The Rasa of poetry and even of spiritual poetry is but a faint echo of Rasa as God. The Bhavas, in our opinion, are related to the Rasas as function to structure in Modern Physiology, and are as superior to Rasas as the to the in Samkhya Philosophy. V The New Nine-fold Scheme of Rasas. - The next question that arises is how many ultimate Rasas are there? Bharata in the following verse gives eight such रसs :-