Das pretended it to be your explanation of the Anand Vikram Samrat and your whole discussion on the chronology of the poem are very tempting. My own acquaintance with Hindi is too faint, to allow me to decide that manysided question-for it is not only a chronological one-but it seems to me, to say the least, that the question has been put by you on a new basis. The first point perhaps to be settled would be the perfect authenticity of the new documents of which you have given facsimiles. On the other hand there is methinks little room, if any to doubt that the Visala and Vigraha of the Delhi pillar are one and the same king and that this Vigraha, son of Avalla, is the same as the Vigraharaja, son of Arnoraja of the Ajmere inscription. But was there a former Visala amongst the Maharajas of Ajmere That is another question which must remain over
(३) वर्लिन से प्रोफेसर आर० पीशल अपने २७ मार्च, १९०४ के पत्र में यह लिखते हैं-
The annual report sent to me by Gorernment has reached me in due time but I could not go through it but not during the Easter vacations. I am glad to say that I have learned much from your report which is done very well and in a
